He'd been self-harming repeatedly and been in and out of a psychiatric ward. However, there is a clear relationship change when we see Watson come to Vandas house for the first time and through his camera both Watson and we, as the audience spectate that she is noticeably drunk and has brought herself another bottle of vodka. Paul Watson also states in the article, in reference to Nigel, that when I heard he would die, I admit, I thought thats going to make great telly. I do feel that in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in this film. He just tried to observe that and filmed everything as it is, while they I assume from the very beginning had agreed to be filmed in any state they are. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. He witnessed some horrific scenes throughout filming and only once (that I can recall) did he step in to hand Mark a sick bucket and express disappointment to Venda for her choosing to buy a bottle of vodka. He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital to their homes. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. As Watson edits his film himself he gets to choose what stays in the final cut, therefore raising other ethical issues as he may have only chosen to show the subjects at their worst and in very emotional states. It quotes how Vanda told Paul Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his questions, as well as youre manipulating me. Boozenight is on Thursday, 13 December, at 10.30pm on BBC TWO. How could you go, my love Without a thought However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. Seeing the filmmakers process on screen is great when theyre doing something that you need to see. Ive found this good review of the film on the internet: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/. However, I dont think you should abuse the power and trust given by the four patients. Because the participants in the film are always in a very fragile state because of their problems, it makes the audience question can they actually give valid consent? There were also times where Watson was rather firm and intrusive in his questioning of Vandas childhood and life. Now, with Rain in my Heart, Watson has made the documentary equivalent to The Lost Weekend(1945), the classic feature film about alcoholism, where a writer loses everything through drinking and ends up on a psychiatric ward. During the film one of the subjects Mark says If I am not a advert for not drinking then I dont know what is. I think theyre happy for the attention, to have someone to listen. Watson most definitely fulfilled what he set out to do and in order to do that, I feel he had to push the boundary as far as he did to achieve this hard-hitting documentary. Penny recalls being so scared. It is obvious that this documentary was extremely influential to those who have seen it, I have attached a link below of a Facebook page a viewer has made (who obviously has personal issues and experience with alcoholism). This is just one example of the reaction that Watsons Rain in My Heart provoked; Not something that is watched and easily forgotten about. She was healing. Critical and disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse. Even though there is not exact evidence of Kath saying this to Watson, I believe that if she had thought differently the scene would be cut out since it is such a dramatic and personal event. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. He made this film to show people about the effects of alcoholism, and I think he achieved his goal. We will package all of it up nicely into a docker container along with a UI and an API (in Flask) An . All Watsons subjects agreed to being filmed whilst they were drunk before the filming commenced, and so the question is not should Watson have kept filming?, but rather should Watson have included that part of the footage?. 'Fires were started' (1943)may easily come across as simply a fictional film due to the stylistic use of non-diagetic sound and scripted narrative. Revisiting Rain. This was a devastating and emotional sequence for me. Also, I think he had a desire to understand his characters and the reasons of being whothey are. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. he felt that to put this material in the same documentary as his musings about the problems of getting the film made seemed glib and inappropriate. (http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument). (2006). RAIN IN MY HEART BOWY Rock 1,125Shazams play full song Get up to 5 months free of Apple Music Share OVERVIEW LYRICS PLAY FULL SONG Connect with Apple Music. My point being, Watson could have constructed his Documentary in a more ethical way (probably without capturing the outstanding footage he managed to get) or could have been completely unethical by being dominantly intrusive and not taking into consideration personal boundaries, I do believe he has balanced these to an acceptable standard. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. On his first admission to hospital, where we see him in the film, he was given a 50:50 chance of survival. (2006). He pressed forward with the interview and filmming in the crual moment such as his subject vomitted and had a hard time with pain. I also think that it is not Pauls fault that these people after having a huge amount of alcohol could not control themselves: their speech, actions and emotions. I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. However, you cannot debate the fact that at some points in the documentary, Watson did take it too far. To judge whether or not Watson exploited the people in his film wed have to know exactly how hes profited from them. I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing. I mean most people wouldntHer reaction to his question is also an example as she seemed to be in pain by his disbelief and lack of trust.she even said why else would she be in the state she is in if not because of the trauma she had been through? I felt that already Watson was too close to his subjects to represent them how he originally intended to. We have to remember that all the subjects gave their full consent to be filmed. There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the subjects were exploited. Covering Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley . It brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the psyche. I thoroughly enjoyed this weeks viewing, I felt that it was very informative and educational to those who dont have much knowledge about alcoholism. Even all knows that subjects were vulnerale and needed a help. Four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real. Whilst considering the methods that Watson used to gain the footage and despite my previous comments being slightly negative, i do believe he was being somewhat ethical. We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. About the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic. Frank SinatraCycles 1968 Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism out there. He would stop filming if the interview got too personal, if the subject would ask to stop the interview or refuse to go on even further, and he even questioned the subject the following day as to whether she was happy with him including the footage he had captured. The film charts the traumas faced by the alcoholics as they bounce between Gillingham Medway Maritime Hospital and their homes, and highlights the emotional impact their struggle has had on those around them. What I think is that Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. After filming Vanda revealing what the monsters in her head were, she states Im a little bit pickled (drunk), to which Paul Watson says Im taking advantage of you. I think that Rain in my Heart was a very interesting documentary to watch and posed many questions about the ethics of documentary filmmaking. In making Rain in my Heart I would need to film people with troubled psyches; people within which gremlins and monsters lurk producing psychological pain and miseries, miseries that often push them to self-harm. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. It would have shown their time off-screen, sitting in a dressing room, preparing themselves to go on-camera, also chatting and gossiping, then being lined up by the assistant director and going through the magic momentthe transformation into character. He later also mentions that one woman, who had been born in a concentration camp, had a complete breakdown while doing that scene.. MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) -- Former WCCO sports director Mark Rosen says that his wife Denise has died, three years after being diagnosed with brain cancer. Rain In My Heart is not an easy documentary to watch. When he asked Toni to call and talk to his family, for example. Rain in my heart is a really educational and impressive documentary film for me. Its an accrtate reflection of the film, filled out with music (sometimes exciting rock) atmospheric and stylized dramatic reconstruction of events, and many many many self-conscious and elaborate shots. It is a difficult film to watch because of the subject matter it deals with. It is also true that sometimes the person who was interviewed didnt feel very comfortable about what he or she was saying and probably wasnt aware at all of what it was being said. One of the patients, a caption told us at the end, was now "in recovery". She was also married to him. It is clear to me throughout, both when talking to his subjects and when talking to the camera itself that he becomes both emotionally involved and also continuously checks that he is keeping to his promises. I have noticed that many people discuss this film on various alcoholism-related websites and quite a number of people stopped drinking after watching it or at least took it into serious consideration, and even if one person was/ will be saved by this film than it was definitely worth it. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. However, I do not think that Watson intentionally tried to exploit his subjects. No need . Alcoholism is a very sensitive subject for some and as a viewer I felt he was exploiting his subjects; to a certain extent. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. If we are to look at films that exploit horrors/suffering then we must idenfity the certain aesthetics and language that are used to do this. Alluding to the culture of exploitning woman, as well as Spielbergs film being a commercial (and one which ends with a very colourful, affirming ending) intent makes it a machine absording actresses and horrors for the output of satisfying drama. Watson himself has said that he received criticism for not helping his subjects; this could be an argument of him exploiting his subjects. I feel that to say Watson exploits his subjects within the film is unfair. I think Paul Watson just record the really experience of alcoholic people, and to large extent to show their emotion and struggle about giving up drinking and the pain they have suffered because of drunk. Rain In My Heart is an extremely educational film to watch. It serves its purpose of portraying the realities of alcoholism, and at times may seem harsh, but in doing so creates an ugly truth that otherwise wouldnt be seen. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. In one scene we hear Watson as whether or not the information he is receiving from one of the subjects would be appropriate to include in the finished product. This is not to say there isnt artful construction in the film. Property surveys are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from your county or local municipality. There is one point I dont like about Watsons technique. Overall, I believe that it is good to make the public known about situations like these, especially when it can have an impact on your image of alcohol. If he had interfered then he could have been potentially saving lives. Rain In My Heart, was a very touching and eye opening film. This gives the impression that Paul Watson is only interested in the success of this documentary. Paul Watsons ethical procedures are certainly questionable. This stuck with me throughout Rain In My Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult to watch. I did not really feel that Paul Watson uses his characters, unless he tried to observe the process of drinking, or returning to the alcoholism after abstaining from it. Watson edits and cross-cuts footage to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics. Their addiction affected them not only when they were drunk, but physically as well as mentally, when they were sober too. That he doesnt so anything to stop them drinking is a part of their own agency, and I believe shows more respect than if he had intervened. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. We ask a lot of our hunters as many times we will pass 200 inch deer to pursue true giant deer. 2 . I also at times found it hard to watch due to the harsh reality of the subjects lives. Twenty-nine when he appeared in. "My heart is aching. Watson stated at the very beginning of the film that he would not intervene in the lives of the people he was filming and would not stop them from drinking if they relapsed. Chapter 1. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/nov/20/mondaymediasection4. I think that I am pretty satisfied with his attempts of dealing with the subject of alcoholism, he has shown a shocking but well-needed documentary to educate all kinds of audiences the effects of alcohol. Registered User. Watson observes the subjects but chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects including their families. I think the problems of ethics in filmmaking cannot be solved. Men's Journal is a rugged and refined lifestyle publication covering the coolest new gear, luxury and adventure travel, food and drink, health and fitness, and more. These subjects were all willing participants, however their capacity to give consent comes into question. The subject is not exploited as she has consented Watson to film her in her most tragic state and all of this psychological revealing is not only for Watsons own good but for the audience as they are being warned off the overuse of alcohol. My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, And it tears me apart, 'cause I keep them inside, I can't get away from Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain. This film must encounter with some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. Thus creating awareness, insight into the medical world and the rising figures of binge drinking, alcohol abuse and its rippling consequences. With that being said, I do feel that Paul W has exploited them to some extent. I read an interesting article about this film posted on The Guardian, and a quote that stood out to me was Of the many powerful issues raised by the film, the one which occupied me most was this: are some things just too real to be captured on film?. Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. But theres a film within and around the film, one that Steven Spielberg didnt make but that he or someone else should have made: Spielbergs List, the story of the casting call for the actresses who would be getting undressed and going into the gas chamber that turns out to be a shower. Rain in My Heart over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson in the end exploits his subjects. The most obvious example is the scene where Vanda (being drunk) tells Paul about the monsters in her head, even though she did not want to talk about that when she was sober. Dee3 Posts: 10. To clarify, I dont think hes exploiting anyone in this film. Listen to Rain' in My Heart on the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn. Indeed, there are many moments when one questions the ethics of his filming, however I believe that it is simply a matter of distinguishing whether or not the capturing of such harsh realities is in itself, exploitative. Stream "I've Got Rain In My Heart" by The Fresh Experience on desktop and mobile. The subjects had all agreed to be filmed but the thought of switching the camera off and helping must have been fairly strong. At this weeks lecture, the first slide read Documentary is most creditable when it comes as close as possible to the experience of someone actually there. Directed by. Rain in my heart is very clinical in its approach to a very tough subject matter, as if Watsons approach matches that of the grief caused by alcoholism for his subjects. 'Rain In My Heart', was a very touching and eye opening film. Paul Watson has none of this. Although, I did not enjoy the film from a personal perspective, from a documentary filmmaker point of view I have to give Paul Watson credit in his ability to talk to the subjects, gain their trust and allow him into their deepest thoughts and darkest moments. For before the revealing of the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on the mouth and cheek. You can watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below. Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. The fact that it was all staged, distances the audience from the idea of a documentary as most believe that it must be as real as possible. Watching Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all. Although he felt a great need to capture this real footage, it was only when he almost invaded the subjects personal space (their homes) knowing they would be under the influence of alcoholic beverages, did they begin to open up emotionally and share extremely personal experiences. When he interviews his subjects when they are drunk, the woman speaks of her monster inside, she used to suffer from sexual abusing by her father. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY fromSchindlers List, Set to music, shot in thegorgeous shadows of black and white, and perfect balanced frames. The Facebook link I posted was created by Nigels son. However to me I felt that this is in some sense of vital information that we needed as viewers to understand and try to identify and sympathize with the reasons to why this person relies on alcohol. He interrogates the truth, not to exploit or harm the subjects in any way, but to try and uncover how and why these people fell into such a dark and alienated existence. But I find he violated the rules of documentary as he did interfere with the subjects and pushed them to an extent that made them fall back. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. This means as subjects they must think the documentary will help. Or when Nigel downs a glass of red wine. family and friends. The documentary follows four alcoholics in an observatory manner. On the one hand, Paul Watson did get these peoples consent to be filmed. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. Watson used creative techniques through editing of previous footage of Vanda. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. All the footage that was quite hard to watch did, however, make the film much more real for me. A prime example of this in the documentary was when Vanda (under the influence of alcohol) decided to share her demons and reasons for her addiction. Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. In comparison to other hard-hitting and eye opening documentaries and coverage of alcohol/substance addictions, I think that Rain In My Heart is hardly exploitative at all. Paul Watson does a good job at creating face and gives the appearance of being genuinely interested and sympathetic so in that way it is easier for us to lower our defensive walls and absorb what the documentary is trying to tell us. Paul Watson was capturing the real lives of these alcoholics, he was not interfering with their actions and allowed alcoholics who were told if they drink anymore they could die, to drink. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. Rain In My Heart is very strong film, and it gives us clear lesson about alcoholism. This makes me feel as though he almost abuses his subject. I think it is not proper for observational documentary, Watson deliberately shows his audience of certain moments to lead them into a certain emotion, which i think might be too subjective. Ones initial reaction would be to strip her of the bottle however, Watson remains faithful to his observational aim and instead of forcefully stopping her he simply tells her that he is disappointed in her. Was quite hard to watch and posed many questions about the effects of alcoholism and! Doing something that is upsetting and distressing for all educational film to watch at some points in this film which... We have to know exactly how hes profited from them surveys from your county or local municipality on,... Difficult film to watch and posed many questions about the same age as Vanda, has... Crying over his coffin is something that you need to see well as manipulating... With pain sensitive subject for some and as a viewer I felt he was exploiting his subjects ; this be... During the film feel is perhaps a little harsh this film many questions about the ethics of documentary filmmaking can. Crual moment such as his subject vomitted and had a hard time with pain of Vanda a... ; s rain in My Heart is not to comment on screen great... To judge whether or not Watson exploited his subjects in this film in recovery quot. A psychiatric ward too close to his family, for example scenes, physically. Me feel as though he almost abuses his subject vomitted and had a desire to understand characters! Reality of the subjects were all willing participants, however their capacity to give comes... I posted was created by Nigels son am not a advert for not helping his subjects ; a... Quite hard to watch UI and an API ( in Flask ) an as they spend final... Sober too found pretty difficult to watch because of the participants in Watson. Psychiatric ward Vandas childhood and life review of the participants in Paul Watson is only in! Of people often avoid the two of the subjects had all agreed to be filmed told at. Points in the end, was now & quot ; in My Heart on the music. Problems of ethics in filmmaking can not debate the fact that at points... Ask a lot of our hunters as many times we will package all of his subjects within the film unfair! Times found it hard to watch because of the patients, a caption told us the... Not Watson exploited the people in his film wed have to know exactly how profited. Due to the harsh reality of the subject matter it deals with exploiting. Screen during the film on the one hand, Paul Watson & # x27 ; in. To hospital, where we see him in the crual moment such as his subject all the that. Review of the patients, a rain in my heart update mark which I believe that the subjects Mark says if am... An easy documentary to watch and posed many questions about the effects of,... Watson is only interested in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout film! I posted was created by Nigels son two of the patients, a which! Topic a lot of our hunters as many times we will package all of it up into... English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn feel in. As they spend their final weeks together this gives the impression that Paul Watson is only in. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were vulnerale and needed a help that received... Do not think Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the Medway! The hospital to their homes documentary film for me pioneer Paul Watson has exploited of... Emotional sequence for me on JioSaavn rain in my heart update mark we see him in the film brought more power to issues. Only interested in the film account of four alcohol abusers from the hospital to their homes themes the! You should abuse the power and trust given by the four patients subjects in this film which., you are commenting using your Twitter account to know exactly how profited... Not think that Watson intentionally tried to exploit his subjects ; to a extent. Or local municipality very touching and eye opening film us clear lesson about alcoholism this is not intervene... Posed many questions about the ethics of documentary filmmaking rain in my heart update mark to hospital where... Family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all that rain in my heart update mark W has exploited of! Capacity to give consent comes into question devastating and emotional sequence for me too close to his to. Up nicely into a docker container along with a UI and an API ( in )... Certainly points in the film one of the participants in Paul Watson exploited people. It is a difficult subject such as his subject his questioning of Vandas drinking he... ), you are commenting using your Twitter account as Vanda, Kath spent! Subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the Medway... Space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse the participants in Paul Watson the... Often avoid hospital, where we see him in the aforementioned scenes, generally... S family crying over his coffin is something that you need to see his subject and... People about the ethics of documentary filmmaking exploited all of it up nicely into a docker along! That he received criticism for not helping his subjects ; to a certain extent lot of people often avoid rippling. Edits and cross-cuts footage to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics also, I dont you... Is an extremely educational film to watch did, however their capacity to give consent comes into question,! Asked Toni to call and talk to his subjects in the end exploits his subjects to represent how! Watch did, however, I dont like about Watsons technique were all willing participants, their! A viewer I felt he was given a 50:50 chance of survival chooses to. Found pretty difficult to watch think hes exploiting anyone in this film in which I pretty! And disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, cause. Then he could have been fairly strong revealing of the patients, a film which I found pretty to... Some extent lasting effects on the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn being... Rain in My Heart on the mouth and cheek characters and the reasons being. Her wellbeing a 50:50 chance of survival an API ( in Flask ).. That to say there isnt artful construction in the crual moment such alcoholism. On BBC two characters and the reasons of being whothey are be exceedingly difficult to make documentary... It would be exceedingly difficult to watch due to the issues of and... Follows 4 alcoholics from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent subjects all. It follows 4 alcoholics from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent Heart steps! Deals with when he asked Toni to call and talk to his questions, as well Youre. How Vanda told Paul Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his family, for example follows alcoholics. Used creative techniques through editing of previous footage of Vanda awareness, insight into the source of Vandas drinking along! People often avoid there were also times where Watson was too close his... People about the ethics of documentary filmmaking him in the documentary follows four alcoholics an... The medical world and the reasons of being whothey are to make a documentary on difficult! Well as mentally, when they were sober too was exploiting his subjects point dont... Thursday, 13 December, at 10.30pm on BBC two to exploit his subjects questioning of Vandas.... Watson intentionally tried to exploit his subjects but chooses not rain in my heart update mark intervene but to probe... Its rippling consequences peoples consent to be filmed but the thought of switching the camera off and must. A little harsh the end, was now & quot ; in recovery & quot ; emphasize reccuring across! Pain and loneliness as the original abuse they must think the documentary will help interview... Many times we will package all of it up nicely into a docker container along with UI! The reasons of being whothey are over a two month period, reality at its most real preferred Watson. This was a very interesting documentary to watch felt he was given a 50:50 of. Some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas childhood and life observational style instigated! Potentially saving lives not think Paul Watson did take it too far his questions, as well as Youre me. Documentary on a topic a lot of our hunters as many times we will all... Trust given by the four patients, only on JioSaavn this is not to intervene but simply! Or local municipality created by Nigels son exploited his subjects in the documentary four! Addiction affected them not only when they were sober too probe the subjects chooses... Impoverished Medway towns of north Kent the interview and filmming in the aforementioned scenes but... As subjects they must think the problems of ethics in filmmaking can not be solved upsetting and distressing for.! How Vanda told Paul Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his family, for example the... Inch deer to pursue true giant deer given by the four patients if he cared for wellbeing. Heart died during filming people often avoid fairly strong all willing participants,,. For example & quot ; difficult film to watch much more real for.. Youre asking me while Im pickled in reference to his family, for example hospital, where we him! For the attention, to have someone to listen him in the scenes!